首页> 外文OA文献 >Who wants to be involved in health care decisions? Comparing preferences for individual and collective involvement in England and Sweden
【2h】

Who wants to be involved in health care decisions? Comparing preferences for individual and collective involvement in England and Sweden

机译:谁想参与医疗保健决策?比较英格兰和瑞典对个人和集体参与的偏好

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Patient and public involvement (PPI) is framed as positive for individuals, the health system, public health, as well as for communities and society as a whole. We investigated whether preferences for PPI differed between two countries with Beveridge type health systems-Sweden and England. We measured willingness to be involved in individual treatment decisions and in decisions about the organization and provision of local health and social care services. Methods: This was a comparative cross-sectional study of the general population's preferences. Together, the two samples included 3125 respondents; 1625 in England and 1500 in Sweden. Country differences were analysed in a multinomial regression model controlling for gender, age and educational attainment. Results: Overall, 68% of respondents wanted a passive patient role and 44% wanted to be involved in local decisions about organization and provision of services. In comparison with in Sweden, they were in England less likely to want a health professional such as a GP or consultant to make decisions about their treatment and also more likely to want to make their own decisions. They were also less likely to want to be involved in local service development decisions. An increased likelihood of wanting to be involved in organizational decision-making was associated with individuals wanting to make their own treatment decisions. Women were less likely to want health professionals to make decisions and more likely to want to be involved in organizational decisions. Conclusions: An effective health system that ensures public health must integrate an effective approach to PPI both in individual treatment decisions and shaping local health and social care priorities. To be effective, involvement activities must take in to account the variation in the desire for involvement and the implications that this has for equity. More work is needed to understand the relationship between the desire to be involved and actually being involved, but both appear related to judgements of the impact of involvement on health care decisions.
机译:背景:患者和公众参与(PPI)的框架对个人,卫生系统,公共卫生以及整个社区和整个社会都是积极的。我们调查了在具有贝弗里奇类型卫生系统的两个国家(瑞典和英国)之间对PPI的偏好是否有所不同。我们测量了参与个人治疗决策以及有关组织和提供当地卫生与社会护理服务的决策的意愿。方法:这是对一般人群偏好的比较性横断面研究。这两个样本总共包括3125名受访者。英国1625年,瑞典1500年。在控制性别,年龄和受教育程度的多项式回归模型中分析了国家差异。结果:总体而言,68%的受访者希望患者成为被动角色,而44%的受访者希望参与有关组织和服务提供的本地决策。与瑞典相比,在英国,他们希望医疗专家(例如全科医生或顾问)做出有关其治疗的决定的可能性较小,也更有可能希望做出自己的决定。他们也不太可能希望参与本地服务开发决策。想要参与组织决策的可能性与想要做出自己的治疗决策的个体相关。妇女不太可能希望卫生专业人员做出决定,而更希望参与组织的决定。结论:一个确保公共卫生的有效卫生系统,必须在个人治疗决策中以及在制定当地卫生和社会关怀优先事项时纳入有效的PPI方法。为提高效率,参与活动必须考虑到参与愿望的变化及其对公平的影响。需要更多的工作来理解参与意愿与实际参与之间的关系,但两者似乎都与对参与对卫生保健决策的影响的判断有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号